So, you want to work in professional baseball?

There have been more than a few posts on how to break into the game we all love, but not many on the player development side of baseball; most focus on the scouting and/or operations departments. I’ll talk a little bit about how I got my start in the game.

For those who do not know me – and I can hardly blame you – my name is Kyle Boddy. I’m 31 years old and the President and Founder of Driveline Baseball, which is my company based out of Seattle, WA that not only provides consulting services to 3 MLB teams and 25+ colleges (including 2014 CWS Champions Vanderbilt and Pac-12 champions Oregon State) but also trains 25+ professional baseball players and another 100 or so amateur players across various levels of the game – youth, high school, and college. I also designed and led the initiative to develop different types of weighted balls for training purposes (Driveline PlyoCare and Elite Weighted Baseballs). I have two rotating employees, one of whom is playing professional baseball for the White Sox, and another who just finished college. I run the business with my partner Mike Rathwell, who bought a percentage of the business and became the CEO of the company in 2014; he now runs the business operations side of Driveline Baseball while I head up research and development.


I’ve been flown to Spring Training camps in both the Grapefruit League and the Cactus League to interview for jobs and pitch my services; in fact, I just got back from a team-paid first class roundtrip flight from an unnamed complex. I’ve given seminars across the country, Canada, and Europe, and will likely do 15 or more visits in 2015 as we begin our push to become a more global company. I’ve secured meetings with some of the most important agents in the game to discuss training their pitchers. An assistant general manager of a forward-thinking team told a national reporter that I am the most advanced pitching coach or trainer in the nation due to my strong analytical background, not common in the coaching ranks. I’ve turned down two full-time offers to work in MLB organizations and one offer to become a competitive national team’s pitching coach.

I have a lot of plans to expand and become even more relevant in the game of professional baseball, but it all had to start somewhere. Most other posts on the subject will talk about the years of self-sacrifice and the long hours it will take, as if that’s some sort of deterrant. If you’re reading this, then you already know that you will have to work 60-80 hour weeks and get paid worse than minimum wage to get your start – and you’re willing to do that. What you probably don’t understand is the amount of self-doubt and emotional turmoil you – and your family – will have to endure as you try to make it. Entrepreneurship is almost always viewed with rose-colored glasses and spoken about like the road was well-worn and totally worth it.

I can’t say I always agree.

Let’s begin with the first thing, shall we?

You are underqualified.

If you happen to want to work in baseball operations – which most younger Internet baseball nerds tend to – then my god, you are so far behind you have no idea. To put it into context, I am merely a guy who primarily works on the player development side along a bunch of coaches who either didn’t go to college or saw it as a three-year fun ride to continue playing baseball before entering the pro ranks. There’s a few guys who are incredibly intelligent and educated, but most were former players who prioritized playing the game – not that there’s anything wrong with that.

I am a former Microsoft employee. I studied Economics and Computer Science before dropping out to work for an online poker company, then founded my own international boutique asset management company with three other partners. My last job in software development before I worked in baseball full-time was a Data Scientist. I have strong command of probability theory, statistics, programming, mathematics, game theory, database analysis, machine learning, and technical documentation.

EV Investments
Some humor to lighten the mood – me and my first partner at a job fair.


I’ve written for years at the fringes of sabermetrics for The Hardball Times and my own blogs, discussing the marriage of player development and how wins are generated.

I am vastly, vastly underqualified to take ANY job in baseball operations.

The people in operations that make actual decisions – not interns that get chewed through on a regular basis – are so incredibly educated and knowledgeable (and usually intelligent) that it makes my background look like a joke. They usually have a much stronger grasp of statistics – generally at a Ph.D. level – than I do, whether it’s formal or not. In most cases, the people in operations are so much stronger intuitively about baseball than I am that the rest doesn’t matter. What they think of off-hand about the game dwarfs what could take me an obsessed 20 hours to just roll around in my head.


With all that being said, here’s what is hot now and what you absolutely need to know if you want to get your start in operations and stick around – all of these are at master-level ability, by the way:

  • Stats packages (R being the most popular)
  • Database analysis (MS SQL server for whatever reason is the most popular here)
  • Data mining / scraping
  • PITCHf/x analysis
  • Trackman analysis (optional, but you should have a good grasp of the operating physics and understand applied physics / laws of motion)
  • General software development (preferably Python, also can be optional but you better have a very good grasp of programming in general)

It goes without saying you should be able to calculate all of the major metrics (wOBA, WAR, wRC+, etc) and understand their limitations. You also need to have a strong intuitive sense for how things get put together. After six years of working in software development I can tell you that the vast majority of programmers have little – if any – creative ability, since they think it’s unnecessary. The truth is that the best developers are on par with the best artists and liberal arts majors when it comes to intuitive sense and creative thinking; writing code to solve unique problems is not any different than penning a new novel.

But I want to work in scouting or player development!


First of all, almost no one in the scouting or player development departments have respect for those who come from outside of the game. If you didn’t play professional baseball at a reasonable level, you will ALWAYS be looked down upon. (This still holds true for me, and always will.)

Secondly, they have a point. So you’ve written 50 or 60 articles on scouting players and given your opinion on amateurs and pro players. So what? So has basically everyone on the Internet and everyone inside of baseball organizations. Your opinions are probably not anything new, and even if you were lucky enough to get sponsored to get into MLB scout school, everyone there already has that base level of knowledge.

Consider that it’s nearly impossible to get an area scouting job that pays something, and that these jobs pay well under minimum wage if you factor in all of the travel and work you have to put into it. The same goes for coaching at affiliate levels – and you can forget about coaching unless you’ve played minor league ball, it basically never happens.


What are your unique insights going to be? You might think it’s novel to point at someone’s swing or throwing mechanics and say “This looks bad,” but it isn’t. Scouts have seen enough baseball that they have built a neural network – flawed as it may be – that does that job just fine. The era of trying to break into the higher levels of the game by visual analysis is fast coming to a close. What teams need – even if they don’t yet understand it – is how to apply unique knowledge to actually improve their athletes. Sure, a random guy in AA has a swing that won’t translate – this isn’t a hard thing to figure out once you’ve watched enough baseball and coached enough athletes. But can you teach him how to develop a better swing beyond saying “This particular flaw will lead to you bottoming out in three years?” That cue is not helpful. What training methods and instruction can you give the athlete to become a major league average player? If you can do THAT, you are very useful.

However, here’s the rub – NO ONE THINKS YOU CAN DO THAT. Literally. Almost everyone inside professional baseball believes that talent is innate and ability cannot be changed, even though it’s obvious this is false. They believe it because they have likely seen thousands of prospects flame out when all they had to do was make a small change to their swing. So there’s that wall you must climb.

How did you do it?

I got my start by coaching 13 and 14 year olds in Little League baseball in Northeast Seattle. I have Ray Moser to thank for that. It was amazing to me that even at that age, generic scouting lingo still persisted through parents. They grew up watching these kids play baseball and applied their heuristic of how good they were at age 10 to how good they should be at age 14, even if it was totally incorrect. After that, I coached at Roosevelt High School, one year as an assistant freshman coach and one year as the head freshman coach. Both years our team outperformed the JV and Varsity teams despite having players poached from it, yet I was fired after the 2nd year since I wasn’t buddies with the head coach (who would be fired the next year anyway). I got sick of coaching teams and decided to coach individual athletes out of my townhome garage in North Seattle, which was 300 square feet at best.

Throughout all of this, I voraciously read every single research paper on biomechanics, training, and kinesiology. I bought 15 textbooks on anatomy and sports science and annotated them all. I set up interviews with medical directors, emailed tons of people, even flew out to meet baseball writers to learn from them. I gave lessons and trained pitchers, then bought the first consumer-grade high speed cameras available at a sub-$1000 price point, the Casio Exilim EX-FH20. I emailed back and forth with the people at ASMI, and when they expressed their surprise that I’d want to build my own biomechanics lab, I reverse engineered the solution by reading the groundbreaking papers of Dr. Jesus Dapena and Michael Feltner, as well as Dr. Fleisig’s own dissertation.

(I told a variant of this story at the 2014 ABCA convention, and a coach said: “You’re really fucking smart, aren’t you?” I said: “More like stubborn. With Google and a relentless mind, all things are possible.”)

Building a biomechanics lab seems impossible, and make no mistake, it’s not easy. But it’s just math. Once you see the matrix logic that goes into DLT, you probably can’t figure it out. But if you just Google it and buy the relevant textbooks, constantly grinding down level after level until you reach a place of familiarity, then you can build up from there. For me, my knowledge stalled out at Discrete Math I and Calculus II. I started from there and built my way up, teaching myself post-graduate mathematics and physics to get the job done, eventually building the control object in the aisles of Home Depot.

Driveline Research
Driveline Research

I opened up shop in a dilapidated warehouse in North Seattle and built a weight training area out of plywood, hinges, and chicken wire. We trained athletes there that would go on to play college baseball, win track and field meets, and break through velocity barriers I never thought possible. Of course, I was running the business at a loss the entire time while working full-time as a software developer or data scientist. I’d train athletes for 15-20 hours per week, work 50 hours per week, commute 10 hours per week, and study baseball another 20-30 hours per week – all while having a new family, as my wife and I would have our first son around this time.

Emotional Strain

Here’s what they don’t tell you – you start to lose contact with your friends. If you do this for any length of time and can outlast the initial spark that every writer gets, then you settle into the slow burn and realization that if you want to do this for the next 25 years, you’re going to have to work harder at this than you ever worked at anything in your life. Which means that your friends who don’t share this kind of passion go by the wayside, because you start to become unable to identify with them. Your daily job becomes even more of a grind, since you know you don’t want to be there, but you have to provide for yourself – and in some cases, a family. Baseball isn’t paying the bills, and life comes before your hobby. If you have a loving and understanding partner in a relationship, they’ll support you, but it will still place unbelievable strain and stress on the structures of the relationship. Ever wonder why so many players, coaches, and scouts are either single or divorced?

If you weren’t lucky enough to be born into the baseball track by being a gifted athlete or the son of a high-ranking scout, you will fight tooth and nail to gain every edge possible, and this will warp your very soul. It’s not that you don’t have free time, it’s that you start to wonder why you would ever spend this free time on anything but bettering yourself and advancing your career. Priorities begin to violently shift.

This is no different than successful entrepreneurs, of course. However, most people who want to break into baseball don’t have a good grasp of what it’s like to be an entrepreneur. It is impossible to understand sacrifice until you are extremely deep into the subject material; I always use this quote from David Foster Wallace on Michael Joyce about his tennis career:

Whether or not he ends up in the top ten and a name anybody will know, Michael Joyce will remain a paradox. The restrictions on his life have been, in my opinion, grotesque; and in certain ways Joyce himself is a grotesque. But the radical compression of his attention and sense of himself have allowed him to become a transcendent practitioner of an art — something few of us get to be. They’ve allowed him to visit and test parts of his psychic reserves most of us do not even know for sure we have (courage, playing with violent nausea, not choking, et cetera).

Joyce is, in other words, a complete man, though in a grotesquely limited way. But he wants more. He wants to be the best, to have his name known, to hold professional trophies over his head as he patiently turns in all four directions for the media. He wants this and will pay to have it — to pursue it, let it define him — and will pay up with the regretless cheer of a man for whom issues of choice became irrelevant a long time ago. Already, for Joyce, at twenty-two, it’s too late for anything else; he’s invested too much, is in too deep. I think he’s both lucky and unlucky. He will say he is happy and mean it. Wish him well.

It is probably worth noting that this is not the only way to focus on a career in baseball. There are a lot of people who put in a decent amount of work and get noticed through writing for years at little/no pay on Fangraphs or their SB Nation blog, eventually scoring a low-paying and low-ranking job in baseball. They work there for years, content with the job at hand.

But for those who want to work in decision-making roles, positions where you have serious impact, it takes a different gear. And it’d be criminal to write this post and tell you that it was just a simple shift in attitude.


After partnering with a local select team to expand my business, I eventually got my first flight to Spring Training to interview with a professional team in 2012 after completing a project at no pay to prove that I could perform basic scouting analysis of pitchers. It would take months to get an official offer from them; in the meantime, I presented at a conference in Houston, which drew enough attention due to our very thorough and scientific process on training that it scored me a few professional pitchers as clients, including Trevor Bauer. Word got around that I knew how to train pitchers better than most people, and clientele expanded. Colleges began to bite, and organic growth compounded our free blog articles on baseball training. Through this, I spent no money and little attention on marketing, since baseball coaches do not generally respond well to this – at least not the ones that will give you long-lasting opportunities. They want referrals from people that they trust, and this takes time. To the outside observer, I went from a nobody to a company that trains some of the best college programs in the world and multiple MLB pitchers in a year.

But in reality, the foundation for success was built through years and years of sacrifice, self-doubt, and constant sleepless nights with my resume in front of me, ready to submit it to various job portals and take a full-time job making 5 times what I was making while working half as many hours.

It’s not the lack of money, the reduction in your friend pool, or the increased stress that will cause you to crack. It is the creeping self-doubt and fear that you are wasting your time and life at a goal that is stupid – after all, it’s a dumb baseball game, does it really deserve this much attention?

Today I’m stable, though still making half as much as I was three years ago as a full-time data scientist. My salary isn’t likely to catch up for another 18-24 months, if I’m lucky. But I do love going to work and my ability to grind on a project for hours, days, weeks, and months on end remains my biggest competitive advantage. Those who know me will often ask: “Was it all worth it,” casually assuming the answer is “Yes, obviously.”

I still tell them that I don’t know. What I went through for years is what most will go through as they slog their way through 60 hour workweeks being paid absolutely nothing – usually incurring costs – to break into the game they love.

All I know is that this is the only way I’d approach it; either this way or simply quit. There’s no middle ground. And in working with more and more professional athletes, I can see that they have the same spirit inside them – it is no longer “an issue of choice” as DFW pointed out above.

We pay with the regretless cheer of a man for whom issues of choice became irrelevant a long time ago.

Perhaps that is success.

Nobody Said It Would Be Easy

Richard Feynman famously said:

If you can’t explain something to a first year student, then you haven’t really understood it.

I certainly agree with Richard, but I fear that a common theme amongst people is one of over-simplicity. I see it all the time in business (don’t get me started on Lean Theory zealots), education, and my industry of choice, sports. In my latest article about injuries to pitchers’ arms, I sourced a lot of research both externally and internally to discuss how elbow and shoulder surgeries are not a simple process. It is not simply checkpoint-based mechanics, or the “fact” that kids back in the day threw watermelons in the fields which would strengthen their arms (actually said by a General Manager of an MLB team) – to say such things is to remain willfully ignorant about an extremely complex system.

We have the sum total of humanity’s knowledge at our fingertips through Google Search, which in theory should raise the level of discourse. There is no better way to become “intelligent” than by simply putting every single thought you have into Google Search and reading for hours to gain a deeper understanding – and often refutation – of the beliefs you once held. It is the modern day Library of Alexandria.

Yet this is too difficult for most, and rightfully so. It is a pain in the ass to constantly question your beliefs, thoughts, and things you were very sure were real in this world. But accumulation of knowledge and skill is asymptotic, unfortunately – the more we learn and the more we do, the greater the existing base of knowledge grows and the tougher it becomes to create something in this world. This is, without a doubt, quite frustrating.

However the journey is what really matters; as I am fond of saying, the pleasure is in the hard work. The late nights at 2 AM staring at results from the biomechanics lab are some of the most intellectually and spiritually enriching experiences I have, because it is through that slavish devotion to a niche practice (baseball pitching) that my clients get results that no other trainer could possibly give them. Celebrating the end result comes naturally and I do enjoy it, but losing sight of the journey is the quickest way to grow complacent – and will get you passed very quickly in this world.

Why I Stopped Writing for The Hardball Times

I recently penned my last article for The Hardball Times (for now). They cut out the vast majority of the explanation on why I left, and while most readers surmised why, I wanted to include the unedited version of it here.

Thanks for all your support throughout the years. THT is truly an incredible site.

On another, sadder note…

Years ago, when I left the SB Nation network and abandoned my blog – Driveline Mechanics, may it rest in peace – I eventually approached Dave Studeman to see if The Hardball Times needed someone to contribute articles on pitching mechanics and training. Dave responded that he was very interested in having me write, so naturally, I ignored him for months before contributing my first piece in February 2011 – Pitching mechanics, the uncertainty of data, and fear.

While the Open Biomechanics Project sadly never took off, I’m proud to say that field researchers (tentatively including myself in this group) have made enormous strides on quantifying the pitching delivery, have made breakthroughs in how we train pitchers for improved velocity and durability, and most importantly have significantly increased the amount of interest in this field. The past three years have flown by, and I never hate going into work where all I do is train pitchers, do research, and think about pitching in general.

That last bit should probably tell you where this is going: I love writing for THT, and I absolutely love the new format. The long content model is exactly how I envisioned THT at its best and how I remembered it from years past – timeless articles from Josh Kalk, Dave Gassko, Harry Pavlidis, Colin Wyers, Dan Brooks, Dave Studeman, Paul Nyman, Carlos Gomez, and so, so many others. We have such a great dual model in Fangraphs for breaking news / quick analysis pieces and The Hardball Times for slower content with more in-depth analysis of deeper issues – not to mention the great work being done at Baseball Prospectus.

But (and you knew this was coming), my time at THT has come to a close. I have been hired by an MLB team to work in a scouting and player development hybrid role, and while my contract does not expressly forbid contributing to the public domain, I cannot focus 100% of my attention on my work for the team and continue to write on the same topics. There is also a conflict of interest and disclosure issue here, as I consult for the aforementioned team as well as a major NCAA Division-I powerhouse, and it’s not hard to see how my analyses of these players could be compromised.

Without the help and assistance of Dave Studeman, Joe Distelheim, and Brian Cartwright, I probably would not be in the position I am. I interviewed for many MLB jobs – and had more than one offer – and not a single one of the front office members I interviewed with failed to bring up my work on The Hardball Times (while occasionally missing my contributions elsewhere!). It is no stretch to say that THT played a pivotal role in exposing my work, improving my current business (Driveline Baseball), and landing me what I consider the ideal initial role with an MLB team. While I wish I could disclose the team in question, my initial contract forbids it. Perhaps, in time, that will change, but for now, the scouting/player development sphere is seen as a massive arms race, and protecting trade secrets is vitally important.

So, to all of those who allowed me to stand on your shoulders, I cannot thank you enough. And to you, the readers, for constantly linking to my work and leaving me insightful comments and emails. The encouragement I got from my audience played no small part in me slogging away at 3 AM at my desk, churning out articles and doing tons of research.

I’d like to close with a piece of advice I received from a friend (Graham Goldbeck) as he entered the world of baseball – “Never stop asking questions.” This advice has served me extremely well over the years, and is the single most important tenet I adhere to on a daily basis in my work and life. Always strive to improve and always question what you think you know – and especially what you are SURE you know.

On Education

I think a lot about education options for the general public as well as my son, who is rapidly approaching the age where we will need to make some decisions on what we will be doing in that regard. It is hard for me to remain objective on this viewpoint – as I suspect it is for many – because I feel strong contempt for my experiences in primary, secondary, and to a lesser extent, post-secondary school.

Focusing on post-secondary education is likely to be a waste of time, since it is so far in advance in a person’s development that the impact to society is rather low, minus economic externalities like the scam of student loans threatening to do significant damage to our generation. (This is not really an educational issue but more of a misaligned incentive / government issue, so we’ll skip it for this essay’s purpose.)

I was fortunate enough to have a father who quit his time-consuming contract job at NASA to take a lesser job with predictable work hours and pitch in around the house, while my mother worked a part-time night job. As such, they were around most of the time and applied adequate pressure on me to get my shit done, even if they didn’t really support me in the areas that I found most interesting (gaming, primarily). The impact of having a stable nuclear family cannot be overstated, especially because they could afford to send me to a low-budget private (parochial) school instead of the public primary schooling system.

Now, I realize that I have already described an unbelievable height of privilege and I’m not trying to downplay that; certainly a lot had to go right for me to even be in that position. And I have looked back with a more kind eye on my parents and educators and have forgiven them for simply doing what they felt was best, even if they hadn’t really done any research on what actually was best. Lord knows I have committed far worse sins in my life. However, it is impossible to describe my time in school as productive, useful, or even adequate.

Primary School

I attended St. Francis de Sales, a Catholic school housed in dilapidated buildings that would have been out of date in the 1970’s. The curriculum was as expected, a strong religious component though it was mostly segmented away – we learned about micro/macroevolution and the faith-based initiatives did not significantly impact our other subjects. The material was not overly challenging though everything with done with an larger-than-average authoritarian voice; perhaps a subconscious attempt to project God played a role here.

What was clear was that individual thought was not welcome. Again, nothing groundbreaking; I’m sure almost every intelligent person goes through this. I believe my parents were consulted about the possibility of me skipping 2nd grade as well as the possibility of me attending a gifted program at another parochial school up the street; neither opportunity materialized and I do not recall ever being asked my opinion. (I would have absolutely agreed to skip a grade.)

I made it painfully obvious I was ahead of the curve by asking for homework over the summer breaks, spending all my free time on the Apple IIe machines we had (how I coveted the green and black monsters!), and even spending time in front of a “math machine” which was nothing more than a large calculator. Still, nothing was done to help accelerate my studies, and like most in this situation, I began to lash out. My parents didn’t understand how I could be getting C’s in class while I spent hours and hours trying to understand the finer concepts of Magic: The Gathering and playing a lot of video games, and to be honest, neither could I. At this point I believe the lesson had already been burned into my brain – nothing in life will be difficult if I can leverage my intellect, so it wasn’t worth stressing over. My parents massively overreacted, grounding me from using a computer and gaming consoles for months on end. Never once did they try to have a conversation about alternative ways to further my education. Again, I can’t blame them for this, they both came from religious families with a very strong emphasis on order – and without the Internet, how would they ever come across another opinion that would change their mind?

People who are considered intelligent seem to manifest their intelligence in a limited but variable way. My core competency for someone with a +3 SD intellect (as measured by the WAIS-III, for whatever that is worth [not much]) was that I can intuitively grasp new systems incredibly quickly. Example: By any standard, I am a well below-average Magic player on the PTQ circuit for any number of reasons, but given a brand new set of cards that no one has ever seen, my expected outcome in a tournament far surpasses my normal expectation. If a subject has little to no similarity to another where we can overlay a previous neural net, we struggle with understanding it. I do too, but I get through the initial phases much, much faster than my peers.

It is hard to say what the correct course of action would have been here for 6-11 year old Kyle. My father attempted to get me into more solitary pursuits (electronics, sports, etc) but I did not respond well. Both of my parents were paragons of work ethic – they talked the talk AND walked the walk – but I wasn’t. It’s really no wonder they used punishment next in an attempt to straighten me out.

I have done a lot of reflecting here and I think a Montessori-style education would have served me best. Even at a young age I had issues with authority, though I never outwardly expressed it until high school. (The fear of eternal damnation is a powerful one indeed.) I had never really been told I could do whatever I wanted – sure, every parent and teacher pays lip service to this concept, but few are willing to allow an 8 year old to actually do what he wants to do.

Secondary School

After a Catholic education, I ended up at a public high school, Parma Senior HS. Incredibly scared that honors classes would be too much work, I took only Honors Biology and the rest of the courses were the standard variant. This proved to be a disaster as these courses were a huge waste of time. I posted just one 4.0 equivalent GPA (we had honors weighting, another terrible idea) which was my first semester of my freshman year; after that I started taking to sleeping in class and enjoying all the freedoms I never had at St. Francis.

My guidance counselor refused to allow me to take Computer Programming as a freshman, stating that the class was too advanced and only available to upperclassmen. By the time I was eligible, the class had been dropped from the curriculum; I wouldn’t write a single line of code until I was in college.

While I socially came into my own in high school, educationally the entire four years was a complete waste of time. There were a few notable exceptions; Mr. Cyr was an energetic US History teacher (though the subject material was basically trivia), Mr. Jeckel gave me much of my sense of self-deprecating humor and pushed me to study the sciences more, and Mrs. Lachvader (spelling is wrong for sure) tried her best to motivate me to study advanced Chemistry, but the reality is that a decade of programming me to believe that my intelligence was sufficient more or less killed these signals.

I opted out of my senior year of high school to attend community college; it should be noted I had to fight every step of the way to actually achieve this result, since the taxes that would go to the HS instead would go to the college. When I discovered I could take classes full-time over the Internet (gasp!), I did that and worked 40 hrs/week at the local library. It was truly eye-opening to see that no one gave a shit what I did and I was free to do whatever I wanted at college, and it took me some time to fully internalize it.

My political science professor at Tri-C – Shaun Easley – gave me my official anti-authoritarian streak, which indirectly led to me studying Economics instead of Computer Science while at Baldwin-Wallace.

I’ve done less reflecting here on how my experiences could have improved, because primary programming is far more important, I believe. Had I had an outlet for my intellect and anti-authoritarian roots as a youngster, I would have overcome the idiotic state-based education path set out for me instead of tacitly accepting “yeah, this is how it is” while wasting four years of my life.

That said, my school was woefully underfunded and ill-equipped to deal with outlier cases of any sort, so once again, I can’t blame them specifically. (A recurring theme in most of my reflections is that it’s usually my fault; this is not always true but I have found it better to be overly self-critical.) Still, organizations should recognize a bad fit where it exists and provide an outlet for it; this would require accepting the idea that maybe an outlier case might actually best decide for himself what he wants to do. Those in power tend not to want to decentralize it, so again, it’s simply a rational response – but one that ultimately hurts the very people who are most likely to have the greatest potential to do something major in life.


I have no real conclusion to finish up with here. I will say that my son will be attending some sort of alternative school. I do not trust the public system to adequately handle the job of education; I believe they have massively failed in this regard and that it is not their primary motivation in any case. (Glorified babysitting and hand-holding are the planks, IMO.) If I believed I had the patience and insight, I would opt for home schooling, but that requires a level of delusion that not even I have achieved. I know that I would make a terrible educator for my own son due to conflict of interest.

Though they say kids are prone to making the same mistakes their parents made (and again, I don’t view my parents decisions as mistakes in the conscious sense whatsoever), I plan on instilling a strong sense of self-determination in my son, which will probably take root as anti-authoritarian. While in the short-run this is counterproductive and likely annoying as fuck, they are values I highly respect and ones that I see in most of the successful people that I consider to be role models.

As such, Astrid and I will likely be exploring Montessori schools when the time comes. I want my son to grow up in an environment that is only semi-structured with a lot of room for individual decisions – and more importantly, the ability to say “no” to his authority figures without fear of baseless reprisal.

Man, education is complicated.